HLI
Applauds Cardinal’s Statement concerning Terri
Schiavo
Statement of Cardinal Renato Martino,
President of the Pontifical Council for Justice and
Peace
Vatican City 7
March 2005
The
courts have ruled again and again. Unfortunately,
the deadline for the removal of the tube delivering
food and water to Terri Schiavo is quickly approaching.
I am sorry to have to use the word “deadline”
but this is the most accurate way to describe what
will happen. Without the tube which is providing life-giving
hydration and nutrition, Terri Schiavo will die. But
it is not that simple. She will die a horrible and
cruel death. She will not simply die; she will have
death inflicted upon her over a number of terrible
days even weeks. How can anyone who claims to speak
of the promotion and protection of human rights-of
human life- remain silent? Is this not a question
of the right to life? I believe that I must speak
out about this in the same way that I would speak
of the protection of the unborn and just as I would
concerning any injustice.
Has due process in this case been truly served? Have
all options been employed? Where is love? Where is
human compassion? No one would ever wish to witness
the suffering of another, especially a loved one.
And I am sure that no one could ever choose to witness
suffering or a cruel death being inflicted upon another,
especially one who is loved. How then have we come
to this point?
If it is true that the process has been fair and that
all legal avenues have been exhausted, how is it that
this woman, who has done nothing wrong, will suffer
a fate which society would never tolerate in the case
of a convicted murderer or anyone else convicted of
the most horrendous crimes? Again, it is an issue
of human rights. It is an issue of the right to life,
and as I stated earlier, no one can be the arbiter
for life except God himself!
The State of Florida has many laws on its books which
protect animals, whether they are household pets,
domesticated farm animals or animals destined for
slaughter. (And please pardon me as I make this analogy.
I am not comparing Terri to an animal. I only want
to show the protection that the courts afford to animals
in the State of Florida.) These laws “prohibit[s]
anyone from intentionally committing an act to any
animal which results in cruel death, or excessive
or repeated infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering”
(828.12). It is also unlawful to keep an animal in
a place while failing to supply “a sufficient
quantity of good and wholesome food and water”(828.13).
Are these laws not enforced by the same courts, are
these not the same laws established by lawmakers in
order to protect other creatures of God?
However, in just a few days, [if her husband and the
courts have their way,] this is exactly what will
happen to Terri. She will be completely deprived of
water and food. She will have excessive suffering
and pain inflicted upon her which will lead to her
cruel death. Yet we have come to the point of asking
whether due process has been fully carried out and
all options exhausted on behalf of Terri? This is
unbelievable! Is it not sufficient enough to say that
there are still questions that must be answered? We
plead, we make the urgent appeal for the life of a
helpless human being...a person with whom we all share
our God given human dignity. How can anyone say that
her best interests have been taken into consideration?
In his Message for the Eleventh World Day of the Sick
(11 February 2003) His Holiness Pope John Paul II
stated: “And while palliative treatment in the
final stage of life can be encouraged, avoiding a
“treatment at all costs” mentality, it
will never be permissible to resort to actions or
omissions which by their nature or in the intention
of the person acting are designed to bring about death.”
Palliative care, by its definition is the alleviation
of suffering and relieving pain. In the last stage
of life, it is this care for which we all must hope
because, if the feeding tube is removed and Terri
is forced to die this slow, terrible, painful death,
we must ask ourselves, “And who will be next?”
Will this open the door for a state to decide whether
this or that incapacitated person should die...not
be allowed to die a dignified death but that they
should have death inflicted upon them?
It must stop here and now. The courts, the judges
and everyone involved with this must understand that
all of the questions involved in the case of Terri
Schiavo have not yet been answered. Society must realize
that we can never inflict this sort of death on a
human being, on any other creature, without each and
every one of us and society as a whole suffering a
terrible fate.
|