Contraception
the Love Killer
By John Mallon
Far too many
Catholics think of the Church in terms of laxity or strictness,
when in fact to do so is to miss the whole point. Morality is the
fruit of love. Love of Christ, who said, “If you love me you
will keep my commandments” (Cf. John 14:15). This was not
a threat or some divine arm-twisting, but a statement of fact. Religious
obedience is an act of great spiritual maturity and love. It is
not that we love Him but that He first loved us (Cf. 1 John 4:19).
He is our Bridegroom.
I would be worried
about any engaged couple that was caught up in worry about fidelity
instead of being so dizzy—or sanely—in love that infidelity
was unthinkable. In theological terms we speak of fear of the Lord
as a virtue—which of course it is—but it is not a craven
timorousness, nor is it simply “awe,” as some proposed
in the 60s and 70s to soften the blow of the word “fear.”
Proper fear
of the Lord is the horror one feels at the thought of hurting, harming
or even simply displeasing our beloved, be it a human love or God.
This is called filial fear. Another kind of fear is called “servile
fear” based more in fear of getting caught or being punished.
While this is not altogether a bad thing, filial fear is superior
as it speaks of a higher love.
Little girls
do not grow up dreaming of hopping from bed to bed and contraception,
they dream of a man who will sweep them off their feet, love them
forever and having his many children. A cynicism born of the sexual
revolution has brought emptiness to the hearts, wombs and lives
of far too many modern women. This emptiness and pain can be avoided
or redeemed and healed by the love of Christ and adherence to His
teachings. The Catholic Church believes in such dreams because God
wrote them on the human heart. And there are men who long for such
a woman to love and cherish.
Real lovers
want to give without reserve in God’s own superabundance creating
more hearts and lives to love. Contraception is like kissing through
a screen door and real love cannot tolerate obstacles. Contraception
breeds selfishness and separation that drives a wedge between husband
and wife that kills love. Real lovers want their love to explode
into the posterity of future generations for all eternity. This
is the kind of passion and fulfillment God wants for His children.
Contraception limits what should be boundless. It spits in the face
of this glorious passion and love’s true abandon; and that
is why it is a sin. It seeks to “tame” love, thus killing
it. The Catholic Church is the last bastion on earth of true romance.
The modern world has suffocated love and made sex a thing of deadness.
I am thinking
of all this because of the recent confrontation between Father Thomas
Euteneuer and conservative talk show host Sean Hannity over Hannity’s
public dissent on contraception. As Providence would have it, just
days before this confrontation I was visiting with Father Euteneuer
at the Headquarters of Human Life International discussing various
ways to raise the profile of HLI in order to help the mission. Imagine
my surprise a few days later when I looked up from my dinner at
home to see the face of my host on a “coming up” announcement
on Fox’s Hannity & Colmes program.
That confrontation
is now history and, in my view, it is a milestone, a breakthrough
for the pro-life movement because the evil of contraception is an
essential element of the pro-life message. Contraception is the
very core of the Culture of Death. With out “The Pill”
in the early 60s there would have been no Roe v. Wade in
the early 70s.
Until now it
has been near impossible to break through the wall of silence the
media has in place regarding an intelligent presentation of the
Catholic position on birth control and the scandal that so many
Catholics reject that teaching. Father Euteneuer, by the Grace of
God, unexpectedly broke through that barrier.
What is shocking
is that as a leader in American conservatism, Sean Hannity seems
to have been blissfully unaware that there is a significant movement
in the Catholic Church of people who refer to themselves as “orthodox”
Catholics, meaning they accept Church teachings—all of them—not
out “blind obedience” as is often charged, but out of
love, conviction and principle. Not to mention coming to see the
truth of them and agreeing with them through hard life’s experience.
Many of these Catholics also refer to themselves, somewhat imprecisely,
as “conservative Catholics” mistakenly using the terms
“orthodox” and “conservative” interchangeably.
So it was a
shocker to hear Sean, whom many of these Catholics may have seen
as a champion, behaving in such a hostile way towards a priest presenting
Magisterial Church teaching. It was also a shock to hear a professional
debater stoop to the red herrings and other tactics Hannity resorted
to in attacking the priest, barely letting him speak.
Further, orthodox
Catholics had reason to think of Sean as “one of them”
judging from this comment in an article by William F. Buckley:
Sean Hannity
said that he was himself Catholic
and that he attends a church which on Sundays
is standing room only. He attributes this in part
to God, but mostly to his pastor, who, says
Hannity, is rigorous in his defense of Christian
doctrines, forswearing temptations to truckle
to modernism. (“Churchbound?” December
19, 2003, National Review Online,
http://www.nationalreview.com/buckley/
buckley200312191325.asp)
I wonder what
Sean’s pastor is thinking now. Has he been rigorous in his
defense of Humanae Vitae? If so, where was Sean?
But for all
this, this is not about Sean Hannity. It is about the crisis of
the Church in the West. It is a crisis that this current generation
of affluent, educated Catholics can smugly think they “know
better” than 2000 years of pastoral wisdom, Divine Revelation
and the “expertise in humanity” of the Church of which
the Second Vatican Council spoke. (Cf. Pope Paul VI— Address
to the United Nations, 5 October 1965)
This is a crisis
the Church Herself must answer for one day before the Lord.
The point is
not to pick on Sean, who is a good man, albeit mistaken about his
faith, but this incident throws into relief the problem of so many
Catholics who share his view. The question for Sean and other Catholics,
who are under the impression that this teaching is optional, is:
If your moral compass is not calibrated to the True North of the
Magisterium, what is it set to? From whom do you take direction?
What is the authority you have set above that of the Church’s
divinely established teaching authority? “Conventional wisdom?”
A “climate of opinion?” Or is it a smug attitude of
what C.S. Lewis called “chronological snobbery” following
the naïve assumption that the Church is “behind the times”
on these questions and needs to catch up with the “modern
world?”) If nothing else, any conservative ought to recognize
that the “modern world” is a train wreck, due what Pope
Paul VI called “a general lowering of morality” that
would ensue if contraception became widespread. (Humanae Vitae,
No. 17)
In fact, the
Church does not need to get into the modern world; the modern world
needs to get into the Church if there is to be any true human progress
rather than the decline and degradation we have witnessed over the
last 40 years.
But it gets
worse. Nothing could have vindicated Father Euteneuer’s questioning
of the depth of Sean’s faith than remarks he reportedly made
on his radio show:
"If that
makes me unwanted in the Catholic Church, then I'll have to just
call my buddy Jerry Falwell, and Thomas Road Baptist Church, here
I come. I will accept that taking this position publicly could
result in me being thrown out of the Church. If that's the case
and they don't want me, that's fine."
The level of
wrong-headedness this statement demonstrates, which is an attitude
found in so many modern Catholics, is enough to make one hang one’s
head.
No one is “unwanted”
in the Catholic Church but this is a tiresome charge often made
by those caught up in the ideologies of homosexual activism, feminism,
and others who don’t wish to recognize that being Catholic
means that we at least try to be in conformity to Christ. It is
the first lesson of philosophy 101 that something cannot be and
not be at the same time: the law of non-contradiction. Active homosexuality
and its promotion, abortion advocacy and contraception all contradict
the teachings of Christ as revealed to us by the Holy Spirit mediated
through the Pope and Magisterium which Christ promised would be
free from error in matters of faith and morals. One cannot be a
Pagan and a Catholic simultaneously.
Furthermore,
excommunication is not a statement that one is “unwanted”
by the Church. On the contrary, it is an act of the Church’s
pastoral love to warn a soul that he has strayed from the truth
and is in deep water and needs to rethink some things. Being admitted
to Communion means that one is in communion with the Church,
not subscribing to some other gospel.
Whatever Sean
studied in the seminary it clearly wasn’t ecclesiology or
sacramental theology if he could so glibly abandon the Eucharist
by going to a Protestant church over this matter. Indeed where does
he take his cues? With all due respect to Protestants, Catholics
do not “church hop” until they find one that suits them.
A Catholic may seek out a Catholic parish they prefer,
but no church not in communion with the Chair of Peter—the
Pope—fulfills a Catholic’s Sunday obligation (with emergency
exceptions for some Eastern Orthodox—capital “O”—churches).
No Protestant church believes what the Catholic Church believes
about the Eucharist. Does Sean believe in transubstantiation and
the Real Presence? If so, is he prepared to walk away from the actual
Body and Blood of Jesus Christ over this? It is a chilling thought
for any believing Catholic to contemplate.
Why chilling?
Consider the following quote from the Second Vatican Council: “Hence
they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was
founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either
to enter it, or to remain in it.” (Lumen Gentium,
No. 14).
The question
is, as a Catholic, is Sean a believer? Does he believe what the
Church teaches about the Papacy, that Jesus established it when
he told Peter “I call you Peter and upon this Rock I will
build my Church. What you bind on earth is bound in Heaven”
(Cf. Matt. 18:18)? Or when He promised the Apostles, “I will
send you the Holy Spirit to guide you into all truth” (Cf.
John 16:13-15) and “He who hears you hears me” (Luke
10:16)?
Obviously, Protestants
don’t interpret these verses as the founding of the Papacy
and Magisterium, but does Sean? As a “seminary trained”
“devout Catholic?” Being a devout Catholic involves
a willingness to be taught by the Church, a willingness to change
when mistaken, and above all, a willingness to repent. Contraception
is a serious sin and to claim to be Catholic and publicly declare
otherwise is to give serious scandal.
Many present
day conservatives were once liberal and underwent a “conversion”
to conservatism because they saw the error of liberalism’s
inherent relativism, which rejects objective truth. It is no accident
that there is an alliance between believing Christians (derisively
referred to as the “Religious Right.”) My “conversion”
to political conservatism followed upon a religious conversion,
which convinced me of the Truth of the Catholic Faith in which I
was raised. In the Hannity/Euteneuer confrontation Sean showed a
serious inconsistency in the philosophy in which he makes his living,
showing himself, to the dismay of his Catholic fans, to be politically
conservative but a liberal—a dissident—Catholic.
I’m a
Fox News junkie. I watch Hannity and Colmes nearly every night.
When I see Sean on TV I see him as a friend. I agree with him and
admire him on most things, but Sean, you’re wrong on this
one.
Father Euteneuer
is not your enemy. He is not an ideologue but good man and the kind
of priest who genuinely cares for souls. Your soul. He
has already proved that. He would be a great friend to you from
whom you could learn much. He asked to speak with you in 2004, not
to argue with you or embarrass you, but out of concern for you.
Contraception does real damage and you owe it to yourself to hear
him out, because you are a good man who would not wish to spread
harm. True friends tell us the truth even when it hurts and it is
a wise man that listens to such friends. These opportunities are
all too rare in this life and I urge you to avail yourself of his
friendship.
|